Newport Heights sits on the bluff above Mariners' Mile, north of Pacific Coast Highway and roughly between Newport Boulevard and Irvine Avenue, in the MLS area the board simply calls N6. It is one of the older parts of the city. The homes that have traded here recently were built between 1939 and 2025, with a median year of 1961, which tells you most of what you need to know: this is a postwar tract that has been steadily rebuilt one lot at a time for thirty years.
The street names give it away. Tustin, Santa Ana, Irvine, El Modena, San Bernardino, Redlands, Fullerton, Westminster, Riverside, Aliso, Catalina, La Jolla. The avenues running through the heart of the neighborhood are named for Southern California cities, laid out in the 1920s and 1930s when this was being sold as the high ground above the harbor. Add Holmwood, Catalina, Margaret, Broad, Clay, Laurel, Holly, Saint James, Powell, and Cliff Drive along the bluff, and you have essentially the whole neighborhood.
Homes here are detached single family residences. Every core listing reports no common walls. Sizes across recent sales ran from 861 to 8,347 square feet, median 2,405, which is an enormous spread and is the entire story of this neighborhood, as the next section explains.
Here is the thing about Newport Heights that no portal publishes and that changes how you should read every listing.
Of the 56 core single family homes that closed here in the last two years, 20 of them sat on a lot of exactly 6,375 square feet. Not roughly. Not in a range. The identical number, on more than a third of all sales. That is the original subdivision grid showing through: a standard 50 by 127.5 foot lot, repeated block after block down the avenues.
The median lot across all core sales is also 6,375. The full range runs 3,603 to 17,250, but the middle of this neighborhood is one lot size, repeated.
Now look at what those 20 identical lots sold for. $2,350,000 at the low end and $7,480,000 at the high end. A spread of $5,130,000 on the exact same piece of dirt. The houses on them ranged from 861 to 5,964 square feet.
That is as clean a natural experiment as this business ever gives you. When the land is held constant and the price still moves by more than five million dollars, the price is not about the land. It is entirely about what is standing on it and what condition it is in.
It means you should stop thinking about price per square foot and start thinking about land value plus construction.
The cheapest recent trade on a 6,375 lot was $2,350,000, for a 1,686 square foot 1954 house on Irvine Avenue. A 861 square foot 1950 house on the same street sold for $2,450,000, which the MLS dutifully records as $2,845 per square foot. Nobody paid $2,845 a foot for that cottage. They paid roughly two and a half million dollars for a Newport Heights lot and got a small old house included. Treat something in the neighborhood of $2.4 million as the working land floor on a standard lot and verify it against the specific block, because Cliff Drive and the bluff streets are their own market.
At the other end, the homes built since 2014 on those same standard lots sold between roughly $5.5 million and $7.5 million. So the gap between raw dirt and finished new construction on an identical lot has been running about three to five million dollars. That is your build budget, your carrying cost, your risk, and your profit, all in one number, and it is the number a developer is running before they bid against you.
The per foot math confirms it from the other direction. Homes under 2,000 square feet closed at a median of $1,974 per square foot. Homes at 4,000 square feet and up closed at a median of $1,258 per square foot. Small old homes look expensive per foot because you are buying land. Large new homes look cheap per foot because the land is a smaller share of the total. Same neighborhood, two completely different transactions.
Sorted by age it reads the same way. Homes built before 1970 closed at a median of $2,909,482 on a median 1,793 square feet, at $1,564 per foot. Homes built in 2000 or later closed at a median of $5,525,000 on a median 4,413 square feet, at $1,290 per foot.
Newport Heights has no homeowners association. Every core listing I pulled reports an association fee of $0, with no association name and no association amenities. There are no dues, no board, no architectural committee, and no reserve study to review in your contingency period.
There is no gate. The MLS community field on these listings reports curbs and nothing more. No controlled access, no guard, no community security.
There is no land lease. Every listing reports land lease: no. You own the ground, which in a neighborhood where the ground is most of the value is not a small detail.
The tax tract number on the core listings is 919, which is a quick way to confirm you are actually inside the original Newport Heights subdivision rather than an adjacent pocket that shares the name in marketing copy.
Across the 56 core closings, prices ran from $1,950,000 to $16,500,000, with a median of $3,577,500.
Price per square foot ran from $766.69 to $3,636.81, median $1,408.72. Read that spread with the section above in mind rather than as a measure of value.
Square footage ran 861 to 8,347, median 2,405. Lot sizes ran 3,603 to 17,250, median 6,375. Year built ran 1939 to 2025, median 1961.
Cliff Drive, along the bluff, behaves differently from the rest. The handful of Cliff Drive closings traded at a median around $3,100 per square foot against roughly $1,390 for everything else. That is a striking gap, but it rests on very few transactions and one of them is the same house selling twice, so treat it as a direction rather than a rate. The bluff is worth more. How much more depends on the specific parcel and the specific view.
The most honest way to show a trend is not an index. It is the same house selling twice. Newport Heights gave me four of those in two years.
Two of those are quick resales at higher numbers, which is what a rising market looks like from the inside. The 514 Westminster figure is an asking price, not a sale, and asking prices are opinions. What all four have in common is worth naming: a buyer who bought here in 2024 has not needed to renovate to be ahead.
Days on market across core sales ran 0 to 183, with a median of 33. The median is the least interesting part.
Twelve of the 56 sales closed at zero days on market, and 22 closed in ten days or fewer. That means roughly one in five Newport Heights homes never accumulated a single day of public exposure, and nearly four in ten were spoken for inside a week and a half.
The practical translation is direct. If you are watching a portal for Newport Heights, you are watching the slow half of the market. The homes that sell in zero days are sold agent to agent, or listed already in escrow. If this is the neighborhood you want, you need someone working the blocks, and you need your financing and your inspector arranged before anything appears, because the deals here have been closing in days rather than weeks.
The other end of the range is real too. A 183 day listing in the same data set tells you that homes here do sit, usually when they are priced as if a renovation has already happened.
At the time I pulled this data, Newport Heights had seven active listings and six homes under contract or pending. Actives ran from $1,499,500 to $16,295,000.
Thirteen homes in play across a neighborhood this size is thin. Combine that with the zero day sales above and you get the real shape of this market: not much publicly available, and what is good does not stay public.
This one is worth knowing before you compare this page to an automated estimate anywhere else.
The MLS subdivision code for Newport Heights is used loosely. Of the 66 closed sales carrying that code in the last two years, ten are not in Newport Heights at all. They are attached homes in Newport Crest, Versailles, Bayview and the Superior Avenue corridor, plus a few condominiums on Clay and Broad, and they closed at a median of $1,962,500.
Blend them in and the Newport Heights median drops from $3,577,500 to $3,150,000. Any tool that trusts the subdivision field is reporting a number roughly $427,500 too low. That is not a rounding difference. It is the difference between an accurate expectation and an offer that gets you nowhere.
The fix is boring and effective. Check the tax tract number, check the street name against the list at the top of this page, and check whether the listing reports common walls. If it has common walls, it is not a Newport Heights house.
Does Newport Heights have an HOA?
No. Every core listing reports an association fee of $0, with no association name and no association amenities. There are no dues.
Is Newport Heights gated?
No. The community field on these listings reports curbs and nothing else. There is no gate, no guard and no controlled access.
What do homes in Newport Heights sell for?
Across 56 core closings in the last two years, $1,950,000 to $16,500,000 with a median of $3,577,500.
Why is the median I see on other sites lower?
Because the MLS subdivision code is applied loosely. Ten of the 66 closings carrying the Newport Heights code are attached homes in neighboring complexes, and blending them in pulls the median down to $3,150,000, roughly $427,500 below the real figure.
How big are the lots?
The median lot is 6,375 square feet, and 20 of 56 recent sales sat on a lot of exactly that size. The full range runs 3,603 to 17,250.
Why does everyone quote the same lot size?
Because the original subdivision was laid out on a standard 50 by 127.5 foot lot, and much of the neighborhood still follows that grid.
What is the price per square foot in Newport Heights?
Median $1,408.72 across core sales, with a range of $766.69 to $3,636.81. The spread reflects land value rather than construction quality, so per foot pricing is a poor way to compare homes here.
What is a Newport Heights lot worth by itself?
The lowest recent trade on a standard 6,375 lot was $2,350,000, and a small original cottage on the same street traded at $2,450,000. Treat something near $2.4 million as the working land floor on a mid-block standard lot and verify it against the specific block.
Is it cheaper to buy new or to build?
Recent new construction on standard lots closed roughly between $5.5 million and $7.5 million, against a land floor near $2.4 million. That leaves about three to five million dollars for construction, carry, risk and profit. Whether building pencils depends on your build cost and your timeline, and it is worth running the numbers before assuming either path is cheaper.
How old are the homes?
Recent sales span 1939 to 2025 with a median year of 1961. This is a postwar neighborhood in the middle of a long rebuild.
How fast do homes sell?
Days on market ran 0 to 183 with a median of 33. Twelve of 56 sales closed at zero days on market and 22 closed within ten days.
Why do so many homes sell at zero days on market?
Because they are matched with a buyer before they are publicly exposed, either agent to agent or listed already in escrow. It means a portal search alone will not show you the whole market here.
How many homes are for sale right now?
At the last update, seven active listings and six under contract or pending, with actives from $1,499,500 to $16,295,000. Inventory is thin, which is normal for this neighborhood.
Is Cliff Drive worth more?
Yes, though the sample is small. The Cliff Drive closings traded near $3,100 per square foot against roughly $1,390 elsewhere. The bluff carries a real premium; the exact size of it depends on the parcel and the view, and one of those sales is the same house trading twice.
Is Newport Heights on a land lease?
No. Every listing reports land lease: no.
Are there condos or townhomes in Newport Heights?
Not inside the neighborhood proper. Core listings report no common walls. The attached homes that show up under the Newport Heights label in search results are in adjacent complexes such as Newport Crest, Versailles and Bayview.
Which school district serves Newport Heights?
Newport Mesa Unified School District. Attendance boundaries are set by the district and do change, so confirm your specific address with the district before relying on an assignment.
Where does the data on this page come from?
The California Regional MLS, filtered to the Newport Heights subdivision code inside MLS area N6, using recorded closed sales rather than list prices or estimates, and then hand checked to remove the attached homes that carry the code but are not in the neighborhood. Figures are current as of the last update to this page and should be verified for any specific property.
3,099 people live in Newport Heights, where the median age is 48 and the average individual income is $93,943. Data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Total Population
Median Age
Population Density Population Density This is the number of people per square mile in a neighborhood.
Average individual Income
Newport Heights has 1,152 households, with an average household size of 3. Data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. Here’s what the people living in Newport Heights do for work — and how long it takes them to get there. Data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. 3,099 people call Newport Heights home. The population density is 8,627 and the largest age group is Data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Total Population
Population Density Population Density This is the number of people per square mile in a neighborhood.
Median Age
Men vs Women
Population by Age Group
0-9 Years
10-17 Years
18-24 Years
25-64 Years
65-74 Years
75+ Years
Education Level
Total Households
Average Household Size
Average individual Income
Households with Children
With Children:
Without Children:
Marital Status
Blue vs White Collar Workers
Blue Collar:
White Collar:
There's plenty to do around Newport Heights, including shopping, dining, nightlife, parks, and more. Data provided by Walk Score and Yelp.
Explore popular things to do in the area, including Ultimate 20 Minute Workout, Fine Tuned Form-Pilates Conditioning, and Inspired Hair by Michelle.
| Name | Category | Distance | Reviews |
Ratings by
Yelp
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active | 0.49 miles | 5 reviews | 5/5 stars | |
| Active | 0.49 miles | 0 reviews | 0/5 stars | |
| Beauty | 0.31 miles | 4 reviews | 5/5 stars | |
| Beauty | 0.41 miles | 1 review | 5/5 stars | |
| Beauty | 0.44 miles | 1 review | 5/5 stars | |
| Beauty | 0.46 miles | 0 reviews | 0/5 stars | |
| Beauty | 0.49 miles | 2 reviews | 5/5 stars | |
| Beauty | 0.49 miles | 0 reviews | 0/5 stars | |
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|